Therefore, RAID 0 in my opinion are not for long term storage but more for the capture, editing and transfer, a working drive. However, SSDs are less prone to failure than traditional hard drives but glitches may still occur. Because the array has data striped across all of the drives, the failure will result in total data loss. A physical dollar cost as they are a lot more expensive but also at the cost of data redundancy which means the failure of one drive will cause the entire array to fail. RAID 0 are meant for Speed, but with speed comes a cost. What is the difference between an SSD and an SSD in RAID 0? These are exceptionally faster than traditional hard drives. SSDs come in 2 main categories of speed 500-600MB/s range as seen with the Samsung T5, Sandisk Extreme and the G-Technology Rugged SSD and the RAID 0 SSDs with a transfer speed of 750-950MB/s. Transfer speed is important and if a drive can shave down the agony of the waiting to write or read off of a drive then the external drive was definitely worthwhile. Time is money my friend and YouTubers know this.
